![]() |
Search this site |
|
|
The Roman Catholic approach is to say that only their dogma allows access to God. Believers, wherever they live, can only be saved through Christ, the crucifixion and the sacraments proffered by Catholic priests. That's a tough one for aliens. How exactly do they learn about Jesus? God first has to tell them that salvation is available on our distant planet. Then the devout among them must turned their telescope, radio receivers and other tracking systems towards the Earth in order to beam back copies of the Bible and papal encyclicals. Even if these benighted beings have heard God's good news, there's the question of providing priests to give the sacraments. How can that happen? Since priests can only be ordained by bishops who have been authorised by the Pope, does it mean that the Vatican regularly holds secretive ordinations for the different races of aliens who land in St Peter's Square at night when no-one is looking?
2.11c Each to his own The Catholic approach highlights the absurdity of its claim to be the only authority in the universe on God's existence. If the deity does exist and has created many alien species, it is reasonable to assume that it (the deity) has decreed that each species must find its own path to salvation. But that still begs a question: if humanity is not the centre of universal religion, does worship of God follow the same pattern on every planet? If Christianity reflects the true faith, the Son of God must be on an eternal cosmic journey, spreading the gospel from planet to planet and being executed again and again and again. Other questions also come to mind, such as what form of execution is practised on each planet and what is the gender of the Virgin in species which require three or more sexes to reproduce? In other words, if both aliens and God exist, it is highly unlikely that the human version of the deity reflects God's true nature. We are therefore drawn away from the Jewish-Christian-Muslim concept without knowing what replaces it. Perhaps the Hindu version is the most accurate, allowing, as it does, for thousands of gods to represent the one godhead. In other words, believers who accept the possibility of life on other planets must somehow reconcile that idea with the notion that God is somehow human (because we are supposedly made in his image). If the ultimate essence of God has some humanity, then so too must the aliens in distant solar systems; but if aliens are not humanoid, then neither is God.
2.11d God's irrelevance Trying to reconcile the absurdities of religion with the realities of the universe we live in leads many believers into theological labyrinths from which there is no escape. The more rational response is to use Occam's razor - to simplify the problem by removing unnecessary complications: in this case, God. That leaves us with the simple question of (a) confirming whether and where intelligent alien life exists (b) how to contact such life and (c) whether it would be wise to contact them if we could do so. Indeed, the more we contemplate the possibility of life on other planets, the more remote our earthbound God becomes. Whether Jewish, Christian, Muslim or multi-personality Hindu, our gods are such petty deities, obsessed not with our happiness or our prosperity, but with the minutiae of our sexual behaviour, with our diet and with appropriate forms of worship. Set against the spectacular and humbling backdrop of space, our earthly god reflects not eternal truths but mundane human concerns. The questions we ask about God - does he perform miracles, will he forgive us our sins, is he one or three-in-one or many-in-one? - reveal nothing more than our own insecurities. Since our species first became capable of reflective thought, we have marveled at the universe, knowing that we can only ever glimpse a few of its glories and that we will never fully understand it. It has always unsettled us, and our invention of a god-creator is our vain attempt to bring its magnificence down to human size and comprehension. We start by recognising that the probability of other intelligent species in the universe undermines the claim that man was made in God's image; we end by understanding that compared to the vastness of space, God himself is parochial, insignificant and irrelevant. for a summary of this chapter click here or move on to Chapter Three: God the creator?
Custom Search
Email us, pasting the URL into your letter with the comment This account is protected by Spamarrest. You will receive a one-off request to verify your email before it is delivered. |
If God existed, he would... admire the beauty of a universe that he did not create recognize that eternity is meaningless deny both heaven and hell disown all men and women who speak in his name denounce the harm caused by religious "morality" help the human race to thrive without him If God existed, he would be an atheist. What is the difference between science and faith? science is certain of nothing and requires proof of everything faith is certain of everything and requires proof of nothing Which do you trust? "I know there is no God" or "I believe there is no God" ??? Check the answer |
|
Supporting advertisers helps to provide an income for The Atheist God. Clicking on advertiser links may allow these companies to gather and use information about your visit to this and other websites to provide you with advertisements about goods and services presumed to be of interest to you. |